University of North Florida
Browse the Citations
-OR-

Contact Info

Stuart Chalk, Ph.D.
Department of Chemistry
University of North Florida
Phone: 1-904-620-1938
Fax: 1-904-620-3535
Email: schalk@unf.edu
Website: @unf

View Stuart Chalk's profile on LinkedIn

Iron(II) 1,10-phenanthroline

  • IUPAC Name: iron(2+);1,10-phenanthroline
  • Molecular Formula: C36H24FeN6+2
  • CAS Registry Number: 14708-99-7
  • InChI: InChI=1S/3C12H8N2.Fe/c3*1-3-9-5-6-10-4-2-8-14-12(10)11(9)13-7-1;/h3*1-8H;/q;;;+2
  • InChI Key: LNQCJIZJBYZCME-UHFFFAOYSA-N

@ ChemSpider@ NIST@ PubChem

Citations 2

"Improved Response Of Carbon-paste Electrodes For Electrochemical Detection In Flow Systems By Pretreatment With Surfactants"
Anal. Chem. 1987 Volume 59, Issue 7 Pages 958-962
F. N. Albahadily and Horacio A. Mottola

Abstract: Six different paste compositions (three commercial) were treated with aqueous 0.1% solution of Brij-35, Triton X-100 and Na dodecylbenzenesulfonate. The responses were evaluated by cyclic voltammetry with Fe(CN)64-, tris-(1,10-phenanthroline)iron(II), SO32- and NADH. An improved response was generally obtained from all the treated electrodes with greatly enhanced sensitivity in continuous-flow detection. The treatment lowered the uncompensated cell resistance of the pastes by removing or decreasing the insulating effect of the oily layer formed on smoothing the electrode surface.
Electrode Voltammetry Triton X Surfactant

"Comparison Of The Maximum Sensitivity Of Different Flow Injection Manifold Configurations: Alternating Variable Search Optimization Of The Iron(II)/1,10-phenanthroline System"
Anal. Chem. 1994 Volume 66, Issue 5 Pages 660-666
Stuart J. Chalk and Julian F. Tyson

Abstract: Flow rate, injected volume, manifold length and reagent concentration were studied with single, double and reverse single-line flow injection manifolds (illustrated) for the spectrophotometric determination of Fe(II) complexed with 1,10-phenanthroline. The three flow injection configurations were of comparable sensitivity, although the reverse configuration sensitivity was slightly higher than the other two. All manifolds exhibited maximum sensitivity when the dispersion coefficient (measured from the product profile) was 1.1. The lowest detection limit for Fe (10 ng/l) was obtained with the double-line configuration, due to the absence of I peaks.
Spectrophotometry Optimization Reverse Sensitivity Dispersion